Elevated Bridge B/C - 2010
Moderator: Wisconsin Moderators
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Elevated Bridge B/C - 2010
by Krautkramer » Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:10 pm
We just need some clarification -- the 5 cm x 5 cm loading block on top -->> does this mean that the entire bridge is only 5cm from front to back??
It would seem like too narrow of a bridge and quite unstable. Do we assume that this 5cm measurement does NOT mean that the entire bridge is only 5 cm front to back??? Is there a maximum measurement front to back for these bridges???
Mike Krautkramer - St. Lucy School
It would seem like too narrow of a bridge and quite unstable. Do we assume that this 5cm measurement does NOT mean that the entire bridge is only 5 cm front to back??? Is there a maximum measurement front to back for these bridges???
Mike Krautkramer - St. Lucy School
- Krautkramer
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 6:44 pm
- Full Name: Michael Krautkramer
Re: Elevated Bridge B/C - 2010
by hanutken » Sun Mar 14, 2010 10:27 pm
Krautkramer wrote:We just need some clarification -- the 5 cm x 5 cm loading block on top -->> does this mean that the entire bridge is only 5cm from front to back??
It would seem like too narrow of a bridge and quite unstable. Do we assume that this 5cm measurement does NOT mean that the entire bridge is only 5 cm front to back??? Is there a maximum measurement front to back for these bridges???
Mike Krautkramer - St. Lucy School
“Good question. The rules do not limit the width of a bridge except that the bridge must fit on the test stand which is about 33 cm wide”
Greg Marconnet
- hanutken
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:56 pm
- Full Name: Nicole Hanutke
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest